URL |
Thumb |
The Journal Portal
Browse Journals |
Polls |
deviantART [dee·vee·un'nt·ART]
Keep in Touch!
|
Deviousness |
Just want to say a few things. First, I like this poem. It's a bit clunky in places, and the flow feels a bit heavy, but I think that the way in which the ideas are conveyed are very well done.
I agree with you in that I get a sense that this piece is an excellent anecdote for the state of romance, that it is both a perspective of the one waiting to be loved and rescued by their love from their demon to the one liviing high up in the tower. In fact, on of the best things about this is that the two are at the bottom of the tower, far away from the maiden in the clouds.
And, I'd also just like to say that I agree in part with your comments on the two composers. Back in 2009 I took a class on writing in which it was mentioned that any thoughtful piece of work has states of development. The first comes with the idea, development and crafting of the piece, and finally ends when it is viewed/read by the reader (in this case). I mean, is a poem a poem if no one reads it?
I suppose that's just me rewording your own argument. Ho-hum. In parallel, though, when people ask me the meaning of something that I have created. What I do is show them again and ask them what it means to them. If they're interested, I'll offer to tell them my own thoughts on it and quite often their arguments are more convincing than my own.
I love this. The repeating lines is nice, a great play on the two perspectives that the poem presents.
There's a lingering sense that this isn't about princes and towers after all - although I confess, I've not yet divined what the real meaning is...
I haven't quite sussed out my own composition yet, though. On the one hand, you have the duality of meaning within the poem - how the prince can mean two things at once. But I also have this nagging sense that the prisoner and the prince are representative of something else altogether.